[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Abstract types for OOC



Michael van Acken (Michael.van.Acken@de.uu.net) schrieb:

Well, I don't really like the idea of another language extension at all ;-)
But for implementing this, here is my comment:

 >  PROCEDURE (VAR v : a) [ABSTRACT] F * (x, y : REAL);
 >  END F;

The END should become optional here, too. This is more consistent with the
idea of "unimplemeneted forward methods are abstract".

+++hartmut