[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADT Lib: Persistence

To: ooc-list@informatik.uni-kl.de
Subject: Re: ADT Lib: Persistence
From: Tim Teulings <tim@edge.ping.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 22:20:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <m0yhJAv-0003IfC@fwd12.btx.dtag.de>; from Michael van Acken on Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 09:26:17PM +0200
Mail-Followup-To: ooc-list@informatik.uni-kl.de
References: <m0yhJAv-0003IfC@fwd12.btx.dtag.de>

Hallo!

> 3. The algorithm requires that every instance of `Object' has a field
> `mark'.  Alternative: like reading, writing could use a object table
> and do table lookups to determine the marker.  This would keep
> `Object' small, but takes longer because of the table lookups.

Everything ok. Just want to remark, that this is exactly the way VO has
implemented its (never used and not supported by any object)
persistance. I think Mike G. has done that.

-- 
Gru...
       Tim.

References:
- ADT Lib: Persistence
  - From: Michael van Acken <mvacken@t-online.de>

Prev by Date: Re: ADT Lib (3)
Next by Date: Re: ADT Lib (3)
Prev by thread: ADT Lib: Persistence
Next by thread: Re: ADT Lib: Persistence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread